FAQ
Użytkownicy
Grupy
Galerie
Rejestracja
Zaloguj
Profil
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
Szukaj
Forum Strona Główna
->
Dzielnica Niższa (południowa)
Napisz odpowiedź
Użytkownik
Temat
Treść wiadomości
Emotikony
Więcej Ikon
Kolor:
Domyślny
Ciemnoczerwony
Czerwony
Pomarańćzowy
Brązowy
Żółty
Zielony
Oliwkowy
Błękitny
Niebieski
Ciemnoniebieski
Purpurowy
Fioletowy
Biały
Czarny
Rozmiar:
Minimalny
Mały
Normalny
Duży
Ogromny
Zamknij Tagi
Opcje
HTML:
TAK
BBCode
:
TAK
Uśmieszki:
NIE
Wyłącz HTML w tym poście
Wyłącz BBCode w tym poście
Kod potwierdzający: *
Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Skocz do:
Wybierz forum
Biblioteki Kreatorów
----------------
Księga Zasad
Księga Postaci
Księga Potworów i Bohaterów Niezależnych
FAQ
Miasto: Eriopolis
----------------
Dzielnica Portowa (północna)
Dzielnica Handlowa (wschodnia)
Dzielnica Wyższa (zachodnia)
Dzielnica Niższa (południowa)
Kanały pod Miastem
Okolice Miasta
Dzika Puszcza
----------------
Czarny Las
Wioska Bastai
Wzgórza i Góry
----------------
Las w cieniu Gór
Wzgórza
Zbocze
Chmurne Szczyty
Równina Mgieł
----------------
Wiśniowa Wioska
Stepy
Miasto: Arion
----------------
Arion (epidemia)
Wioska Pravium
Okolice Miasta Arion
Ocean Wiatrów
----------------
Szlaki Handlowe
Wyspa Rukia
Wyspa Piratów
Wyspa Kei-Sumi
W podróży
----------------
Tabor
Cyrk
Pustkowia
----------------
Bagna
Ruiny
Osiem szczytów
Wielkie lasy
Przegląd tematu
Autor
Wiadomość
cxjCXQ107
Wysłany: Sob 10:06, 21 Maj 2011
Temat postu: Development of Strict Liability in English Law Law
The Rule in Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd
Developing Social Policy Using Strict Liability
Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd
v.
Attorney-General of Hong Kong
[1984] clarified the amplitude of this speculation. In
Gammon
, the court ruled that the presumption was especially muscular when an offence was truly criminal and that it can only be displaced in statutes regarding social concerns, such as public safety.
Strict liability too allows the evolution of social policy and the discouragement of definite undesired practices. In
An Introduction to Law
, Professor Phil Harris argues that strict liability has become prevalent in regulatory offences because when tall standards are to be encouraged, it is extra essential that ... offences should be strictly penalized than that conviction should be contingent upon testimony of moral crime (Harris, 2007 p. 321).
There are several arguments for the development of strict liability as a portion of the criminal law. With regard to corporate crime,
Jordan Countdown Collezione Shoes
, the need to prove
mens rea
before a conviction can be made has resulted in a extensive value of criminal case law where conviction has been impossible simply for the mind of a company could not be decided.
In
The Changing Law
(1953), the infamous Lord Denning said namely in mandate that one deed ought be punishable it must be morally blameworthy and this has been true for numerous offenses. The common unity has long been that criminal liability tin only be levied above those who perpetrate the
actus reus
of a crime with the relevant
mens rea
. However,
Jordan 8
, this is not all the circumstance.
Despite its advantages in removing needless criminal defences and promoting social policy, the tribunals have been loath to do away with the absence for
mens rea
. In the case of
Sweet
v.
Parsley
[1970], Lord Reid ruled that while an Act of Parliament fails to mention
mens rea
, the courts will presume that the requirement for a mental element to the crime was intended.
The Oxford Dictionary of Law (Fifth Edition) defines strict liability for a fashion of criminal liability imposed without the need to testify
mens rea
for by least 1 factor of the crime. While there may be defences obtainable,
Air Jordan XIX
, such as automatism, strict liability law is essentially a crime that can be committed without the wisdom, recklessness, malice or intention of the convict.
Why is Strict Liability Law Necessary?
Read on
What Does Actus Reus Mean?
What is Mens Rea?
Accomplices and the Accessories and Abettors Act
Strict liability law has amplified as a means of imposing criminal liability on companies where it would otherwise be impossible to do so, and to subserve greater vigilance in specific zones of social policy, such as driving regulations. It removes certain criminal defences that
Furthermore, the displacement must be stated apparently, or by a essential implication of the effect of the statute in answer.
Gammon
then works on to require that it be shown that creating a strict liability offence would be efficient in promoting the object of the law at encouraging vigilance, otherwise the need for mens rea ambition be assumed regardless.
In
R
v.
P & O Ferries (Dover) Ltd
(1990), case in point, Turner J ordered the acquittal of P & O Ferries afterward
mens rea
could not be attributed to the senior advisers of the corporation; thereby assuring the company itself could no have the mens rea to have committed the crime of manslaughter. Strict liability law essentially removes this back gate criminal defence.
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Elveron phpBB theme/template by
Ulf Frisk
and
Michael Schaeffer
Copyright Š Ulf Frisk, Michael Schaeffer 2004
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Regulamin