Autor Wiadomość
heztfive5b8k
PostWysłany: Czw 9:46, 12 Maj 2011    Temat postu: Top Importance Housing and person population

do we reduce building costs without sacrificing quality and compliance? We begin by accepting some very uncomfortable truth;
Our population far exceeds our planets resources and our rate of population growth compounds this crucial imbalance along the minute.
A sustainable Earth can merely be achieved while each person accepts and embraces a smaller personal footprint.
The fussy ingredient in smaller footprint is a reduced housing size and with that, a global compliance standard that defines (what are) prepossessing individual housing district limits. (Given our human inability to co operate/collaborate this isn't a likely scenario, but I muse this should be above line an of anybody housing manifesto and the key point in any global housing conflab). Since the built context produces nearly half of global carbon emissions, a reduced housing size restrict namely likewise an essential tread to dwindle climate warming.
Pivotal to this' obtain small' programme, is integration of the conception into sustainable housing science; for example,Nike 6.0 Air Mogan 2, LEED is utter ridiculousness when it ignores the manifest 'small imperative'.
So we begin with an ideological evolution of our basic amount system that rejects the folly of 'big is better' and hugs 'less is more' with a religious ardor. In parallel to this belief system and as a natural consequence of it, is the pursuit of extra effective,nike hyperdunk, functional internal alive environments and building methods/systems.
If you've been comprised as I have, in the design/architecture 'conversation' over the quondam ten-year you can see that this revolution is yet underway as communicated in a proliferation of 'small space' design treatises, 'tiny house' blogs, and in the physical world of architectural prototypes and Gurgaon Property
aimed by hunk product prefab charts. A most vivid sample is the go of Dr. David Fisher, Dynamic Architecture, as famous earlier in this dispute by Demarr Ward.
As we acquire impetus with these ideals, housing becomes a system designed, prefabricated, automated, plant built process whose natural scale efficiencies produce a more affordable housing production.
However, when these positive signs are present, we're still a long way from accepting the fundamental beliefs needful to hasten the housing renaissance we have to establish to survive. We need to communicate the message relentlessly; hurrah it from rooftops, inject it in all and any housing chat, and pursue aggressively with governments and business, the conviction that 'the next big thing is SMALL'.
Where does our instant Affordable Housing mission appropriate in all of this?
I watch it as the primary initiative for public/private funding, justified not for its altruism yet rather as the build out of the physical prototype in a project intended apt a government, developer, designer, architect, furniture manufacturer partnership, as the studying universal housing experiment that teaches us how to live SMALL and accustom to the smaller footprint we absence to survive as a species.
Viewed in this light, Affordable Housing tin shed its torn and tattered, impoverished posture and instead transform an exciting current adventure in the evolution of housing for the world.

Powered by phpBB © 2001,2002 phpBB Group