Sweden is not a socialist country from talking abo

px477801

Sweden is not a socialist country from the start with

Industrialization. Thus the upper hand in world economic competition. Sweden survived two world wars. Or pursue a neutral country so far (but it has long been the focus of the military defense of the Soviet Union and Eastern European countries). Sweden since the 20th century, most of the time since the 30's by the Social Democratic Party. Implementation of high wages, high taxes, high welfare Now cropped up an old question: Sweden is not a socialist country? This tells us that, as an economic system based on ownership of the means of production are based on public ownership, is a measure of whether a country's social system of socialism one of the most important criteria. The Swedish business 85%, 94% of the private manufacturing sector. So Sweden is not a socialist country. In fact the two camps exist in several decades. East and West do not think Sweden is a socialist country. West has never been so in all socialist countries hostile to the blockade, evolution it. According to the same port Zhao Dengqing kind of truth. Over the past Sukarno, Nehru, Nasser and other self-styled socialist countries is not true. We also can not always ruling Social Democratic Party,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], with Sweden as the implementation of In other words, All serious people should not forget, Of course, there will be socialism in capitalism (as the capitalist elements of feudal society, feudal slave society and social factors). Dominant position in the non-socialist elements, but is a secondary aspect of conflict. Can not determine the nature of things. So. Can capitalism Marx repeatedly stressed that the proletariat can not readily grasp the bourgeois state machine. It must be smashed and the establishment of the Paris Commune-type state machine of the proletariat. Virtually all socialist countries are not created by the revolution, So there does not exist to eliminate the private ownership of the socialist revolution to replace capitalism is good or improved good question. Incidentally. If we say one hand, long armed struggle by the Chinese Communist Party to power, the great, glorious and correct. On the other hand said that change is good. It not contradictory? Short of democratic socialism is not socialism. Gorbachev's humane democratic socialism and the shameful support of the outcome is a good comrades in the Central Party School recently pointed out in his important speech: implement the scientific concept of development requires that we always adhere to the basic points, Adhere to the Party's basic line must hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics, a clean break with the democratic socialism. (This article Zebian: Jin) 37